“Politics should be the part-time profession of every citizen who would protect the rights and privileges of free people and who would preserve what is good and fruitful in our national heritage.” Dwight D. Eisenhower
Funny list that I found courtesy of LGF, here’s the link for it.
Category 1: The Seed Planters
Examples: Steve Emerson, Daniel Pipes, Bernard Lewis Usual Profession: Academics Main Motivation: Zionism
Category 2: The Theological Warriors
Examples: Robert Spencer, Craig Winn, Pat Robertson Usual Profession: Christian preachers Main Motivation: Religious bigotry
Category 3: The Media Voices
Examples: Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Fox News, Ann Coulter Usual Profession: Radio and TV personalities Main Motivation: Money
Category 4: The Fringe
Examples: LGF, Joe Kaufman, Jewish Task Force Main Motivation: Racism
Category 5: The Politicians
Examples: George W Bush, John McCain, miscellaneous Republican politicians Usual Profession: Politicians Main Motivation: Need to court the anti-Islam vote
Sorry guys for the large break. I’ve had a lot of work to get through, but know the worst is over, yay! Israel has made it to her 60th birthday which is something to celebrate, even if there those who can’t appreciate it, here and here, hat tip to LGF.
My favourite of these links is the Daily Kos one, just read this and laugh.
It thus emerged as a major power and a formidable challenger of existing Arabic powers that will decide the fate of the world, coordinated assassination of President Kennedy which unnaturally led to the hasty re-evaluation of American foreign policy for adjustion that align with the interests of Israeli state for total compatibility in irreversibly entangled alliance.
I’m going to be talking and linking about a few things here, but first how’s this for an eye-catching title? “Lesbians Pick Fight With Gay Women”. This is not joke, its an article about a court case in which the residents from the island of Lesbos are suing gay women!
Next, I’m sure everyone has heard about what happened to those poor children in Austria (locked in a cellar for their whole life). The most interesting thing (and very disturbing) to emerge from this is the fact that the kids thought they were in heaven when they emerged into the sunlight. As well as this, these kids speak in their own private ‘language’ to each other. Words can’t really describe just how, excuse my french, f**ked up that is. Their development is going to be damaged for life, besides being born from incest, I doubt these kids will ever have a normal life. I feel so sorry for them.
Now here is another strange situation that just happened on our metaphorical doorstep (for Australia that is). ‘Timor troops party with rebels’, yep you read right, these people, who many would consider terrorists are being treated like a ‘commander in chief.’
Opposition Fretilin MPs said the party was “bizarre” and sent the wrong message to the people of East Timor.
You think?
“It’s quite immature and also looks bizarre that some, who you call as a rebel who has also been accused of conducting an attack against state, is welcomed like a big head or commander in chief - it is not the right message,” said Arsenio Bano, a Fretilin MP and member of the parliamentary defence and security committee. “Anyone in this country will think now that if you need to get attention from the President or important men, you just need to make trouble - a lot of trouble will allow them to talk to you and negotiate with you.”
Today Israel and Jews all across the world have celebrated Holocaust Day. I have a couple of friends in Poland at the moment who are marking this day while being in Auschwitz on a program called March of the Living. I myself attended this program 2 years ago and I definitely recommend it. The Palestinians however are remembering this day in a different manner (link above).
Meanwhile, Hamas television marked the 63rd anniversary of the Holocaust by suggesting it was orchestrated by Jews to wipe out the disabled among them in preparation for the creation of the state of Israel.
According to the Jerusalem-based Palestinian Media Watch, the head of the Palestinian Centre for Strategic Research, Amin Dabur, said: “The Israeli Holocaust - the whole thing was a joke, and part of the perfect show that (Zionist leader and future Israeli prime minister) Ben Gurion put on”.
The “young energetic and able” were sent to Israel, while the handicapped were sent “so there would be a Holocaust”.
How disgusting is that?
A two-minute siren sounded across Israel at 10am yesterday in memory of the estimated six million Jews who died in the Nazi death camps. People stopped were they were and cars came to a standstill.
That fool Professor Falk who I was talking about in the previous post, has decided that the ‘neocons’ may have played a role 9/11. Yep, he’s that kind of guy; did I mention he was a fan of Ward Churchill? Hat tip to LGF, full article below can be found here.
A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
…
Mr. Falk said, “It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don’t think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.”
I am not going to go into all these conspiracy theories and try and debunk them, you can check out Screw Loose Change for that. But seriously speaking, why in its inifinite wisdom did the UN send an official so obviously biased against Israel, who believes in nut-case conspiracy theories to try and make decision regarding human-rights abuse? Further in the above article former American Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton explains America’s position on this.
When asked for a comment about the appointment of Mr. Falk, a former American ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton said, “This is exactly why we voted against the new human rights council.” A spokesman for the American embassy at the United Nations offered no comment yesterday when asked.
If there was any more doubt about Falk’s unsuitability to this position it can be summarised below.
In a February 16, 1979, op-ed for the New York Times, Mr. Falk praised Ayatollah Khomeini and bemoaned his ill treatment in the American press. He wrote, “The depiction of him as fanatical, reactionary and the bearer of crude prejudices seems certainly and happily false.” Nearly nine months later, student followers of Khomeini invaded the American embassy in Tehran and held 52 diplomats hostage for the following 444 days.
Obviously Israel is not too happy with this and has decided to deny him entry.
Richard Falk is scheduled to take up his post with the UN Human Rights Council in May, but the Foreign Ministry said it will deny Falk a visa to enter Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, at least until a September meeting of the council. At that meeting, Israel intends to ask the council to expand the envoy’s mission to include investigating Palestinian human rights abuses against Israelis.
An obvious and fair question, one any reasonable country would be expected to ask.
According to a Tuesday posting on the British Broadcasting Corporation’s Web site, Falk defended statements he made last summer equating Israel’s treatment of Palestinians with Nazi treatment of Jews during the Holocaust. He told BBC News that Israel has been unfairly shielded from international criticism.
Yeah… because Israel has never been bashed in the UN. Should I even be bothered to mention the countless of times the former Human Rights Council has gone after Israel? Or should I just mention Durban 1 and be done with it.
Yesterday, I started talking about the need for Israel to go into the Gaza strip, topple the current government and set up a regime that will help the Palestinian people destroy their culture of violence they have worked so hard to instill into their children. I just wanted to return to the problem, this ‘culture of violence.’ Many Palestinians believe that this attitude of violence as a first resort will help them to destroy Israel and create their own state. Now, Pajamas Media has an article on this (of which I am basing this one off and you can read it here), which helps to explain a lot of the culture and its consequences in later generations that is inherent in the Gaza Strip at the moment. I’ll give you a really recent example, the suicide bombings at Dimona which killed an Israeli civilian and wounded another. Now ask yourself before watching this people, how many people do you know personally would celebrate the killing of an innocent? Would you yourself be happy if a person you knew was suddenly killed for no other reason other then that he or she belonged to a certain nationality? Or better yet, a religion? Now watch this.
Yes, I’m sure you have seen these clips and images before, but to me, the shock of seeing something like this never really fades. Every time I think about something like this, I still get horrified; I can only imagine what victims and their kin must go through when seeing something like this. Anyway, back to the point of this post. After watching this, it should be clear to you just how much these people embrace violence as one of their own. In order for an progress to be made between the Palestinians in Gaza and Israel, Palestinians need to look at their society that they are living in. Their culture of death will be end of them, not the IDF not economic sanctions but themselves. The only reason that their society has not collapsed into one of civil war and tribalism is the fact that they all have one common enemy, Israel. Lets just say for arguments sake that the Palestinians were somehow successful in achieving their lifelong dream of destroying Israel. Palestinians are celebrating in Jerusalem, AK rounds are going off everywhere and massive celebrations are had by all. Fast forward 10 maybe 20 years later. A huge civil war is going on in Palestine, that culture of death, hate and violence that was nurtured onto Palestinian children all those years ago has finally burst through. That is what will happen if the Palestinians of today keep on doing tomorrow.
You may be asking me know, where’s your proof for this how do you know that this would happen, Palestinians are only like this because Israel treats them like animals. Well the proof of this happened not to long ago. Think back when there was essentially a civil war in the Gaza Strip, Hamas vs. Fatah. It had nothing to do with Israel, this was a war to gain control of the Gaza Strip. Research into sociology and social psychology has shown that once there is no longer an external enemy to focus on, those same violent tendencies and expressions used against the enemy will bloom within a society. Like I said above, no Israel, no unity amongst the Palestinians equals civil war. Think about how Gazan treated Gazan during the Hamas coup:
In the past 48 hours 19 Palestinians have been killed, tossed from rooftops, executed at point-blank range, and shot in hospital wards. That number seems certain to rise. More than 80 Palestinians have now been killed since mid May.
Among yesterday’s dead was a 14-year-old boy and three women, all killed in a Hamas attack on a Fatah security officer’s home.
“They’re firing at us, firing RPGs, firing mortars. We’re not Jews,” the brother of Jamal Abu Jediyan, a Fatah commander, pleaded during a live telephone conversation with a Palestinian radio station.
Minutes later both men were dragged into the streets and riddled with bullets.
Still think what I am saying is false? Unless the Palestinians themselves stop this, and it will have to be Palestinians (can you imagine an Israeli telling a Palestinian how to behave?) there is no hope for Palestinians or a ‘Palestine’.
A clip from the show Pioneers of Tomorrow; this time its Assud the Jew-eating rabbit urging Palestinian children to boycott Danish products, kill anyone who “insults” Mohammed, and wipe out Israel. But don’t worry the EU or UN won’t do a damn thing about this. I wonder if this will make Durban II… Why, I think it is time to give the Palestinians a state!
I am sure everyone has heard of 2001 United Nations anti-racism conference in Durban, South Africa. If you have not, to be brief, it was a conference which was very one-sided against Israel, the conference itself was antisemitic with anti-Israel propaganda going around. The conference was a disgusting exercise in Antisemitism and Holocaust revisionism, complete with stalls selling the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and enough Israel-bashing to satisfy the most brutal anti-Semitic. Basically it was a conference which instead of condemning racism actually helped to spread it. Now, there is a second conference being planned, also in Durban in 2009. Countries such as the U.S. and Canada are already boycotting it and there are plans underway for a counter conference to run at the same time. The goal of this conference would be a focus on anti-racism and Antisemitism. The conference itself would be similar to the 1936 “People’s Olympiad,” which was organised as a protest to the official Olympic Games being in Nazi Germany.
Canadian Senator Jerry Grafstein
A proposed counter-conference that would run parallel to Durban II continues to gather support from parliamentarians around the world, says Senator Jerry Grafstein, left, the Canadian lawmaker behind the alternative event.
Grafstein has been calling on his contacts among parliamentarians around the world for their support for an anti-Durban conference that would run in the same city as Durban II – the followup to the 2001 United Nations anti-racism conference in Durban, South Africa – but would focus on anti-racism and anti-Semitism.
The parallel conference would serve as a corrective to the UN-sponsored gathering, which is likely to reprise the anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism that characterized the original Durban conference, Grafstein said.
U.S. Congressman Alcee Hastings has agreed to join Grafstein as head of an organizing committee.
MPs from a number of western democracies and other states have given verbal support to the parallel conference. “I’ve discussed it with parliamentarians in Europe, Africa, the United States, Australia and Canada, and so far the response has been positive,” Grafstein said. “They like the idea in principle.”
I really hope that Australia gets involved in this, I am certain if Howard was our current Prime Minister, he would be right there. However, now that we have Rudd, I really don’t know. The joys of a Labor PM…
The follow up conference, dubbed Durban II, is being organized by a committee established by the UN Human Rights Council, which itself has been accused of focusing almost exclusively on Israel while ignoring human rights abuses around the world. The UN body has appointed Libya to chair the preparatory committee organizing Durban II, and the committee includes such anti-Israel advocates as Iran and Cuba.
Canada has announced it would not take part in Durban II. Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier, and Jason Kenney, secretary of state for multiculturalism and Canadian identity, issued a statement last month that said: “Canada has a long and proud history of fighting racism, discrimination and intolerance in all its forms. It was for this reason, and its promise of concerted global action against racism, that we participated in [Durban I]. Unfortunately, that conference degenerated into open and divisive expressions of intolerance and anti-Semitism that undermined the principles of the United Nations and the very goals the conference sought to achieve.
“Secretary of State Kenney and I had hoped that the preparatory process for the 2009 Durban Review Conference would remedy the mistakes of the past,” Bernier said. “We have concluded that, despite our efforts, it will not. Canada will, therefore, not participate in the 2009 conference.”
Grafstein noted that Liberal leader Stephane Dion has backed the official Canadian position. Grafstein said that the government’s refusal to attend “is a major step forward from the last time.”
The UN has shown repeatedly that it’s tilted against Israel, Grafstein continued.
Yeah, that shouldn’t have been to hard to work out…
…
Grafstein said an alternative to the Durban II conference would permit human rights advocates to meet at a “balanced conference” and take advantage of the media presence and “so we can act as a restraint on UN officials. This time, they won’t get a free ride.”
Atilla89
gowronx2
mrprofessional
shkoles
